Network of Truth? One Version of the Truth? YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

The gents over at the Diversified Semantic Layer (Greg Myers, Jamie Oswald and Eric Vallo) podcast had themselves a spirited discussion around SAP Analytics latest mantra, ‘The Network of Truth’. Make sure to check out the show notes over on SCN for a good laugh and handy reference guide, too. The discussion was always cordial, but got animated when discussing Greg’s theory that perhaps the ‘Network of Truth’ may have some legs to it.  I left this comment on Eric’s Show Notes blog: “I’m going to lean towards Greg’s side of the rumble. I agree with a lot of what he’s saying, plus it’ll be a fair fight now.”  I figured I’d expand that thought a little bit outside the SCN comment box.

I see where Greg is going with his line of thinking.  The whole ‘Network of Truth’ theory (and not the SAP marketing end of it- take the tools out of the equation and think in broader terms) is something along the lines of the evolution of how people utilize data. My take? As data access becomes faster and faster, conventional relational data warehouses become a commodity. Some businesses will require a data warehouse structure in order to aggregate disparate sources, group it together and make it logical.  But it won’t need to live in a slower relational data warehouse.  If the analytics tools that access that data don’t adapt, they’ll be left behind.

To Jamie’s point, ad hoc and ‘green bar’ reporting won’t be going away anytime soon, either.  Folks are going to want formatted reports, ad hoc report access and the like for years to come.  The question should be: How do we manage the needs and expectations of those ‘classic’ users with the changes and new methodology that newer analytics tools are seeming to bring?  Think about it- just a few years ago, BI teams were just getting their hands around analytics for mobile devices!  What will the landscape look like in the next 5 years?  A common semantic layer, perhaps?  Jamie and I are agreement about what we think the benedits of a unified semantic layer could be. (Heck, we’ve both blogged about it before.)

But like a fully implemented ‘Network of Truth’, a common semantic layer (likely based on HANA) is some time in the future.  Then again, so are Greg’s musings from the podcast. It’s going to take transformational changes in how we consume and utilize data to see where the ‘next big thing’ is coming from…and leading us to.

Advertisements

About golasalle

Gadget Geek, SAP Mentor, computer nerd, SME in Business Intelligence and Halo/MW2 player. Also a ProBoard Firefighter 2 and Fire Police Captain. Can you say dichotomy?
This entry was posted in Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Network of Truth? One Version of the Truth? YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

  1. Greg Myers says:

    Dude, thanks for the thoughtful commentary. I think maybe I wasn’t clear in the podcast about what I was trying to articulate about ad-hoc. Let me try and rectify. I don’t think “ad-hoc” reporting is going away. What I think is going away is what we define as “ad-hoc” today. For example, in a few years, when I want to see the current sales figures, I am NOT going to log into some corporate portal, open up a SALES folder, and go run a report that will fetch the data. What will I do instead? Not sure yet. I could, perhaps, say to my computer (with my inside voice) “What are the current sales figures?” and that data will be fetched for me in milliseconds. Both are ad-hoc, right? My point really was around the cumbersome way we deliver ad-hoc reporting today. I just don’t see it in the future. But Yoda had it right. Difficult to see, the future is. Always in motion. 🙂

    • golasalle says:

      Thanks for clarifying, dude! ☺

      Maybe I’m not clear either, but I agree that ad hoc isn’t going away. I think that future BI clients are going to have to adapt to the new ways that the data presents itself to be analyzed and reported. That is the future and I think Yoda totally has it right!!

  2. I think Ad hoc is going to mean what it always should have, and that we’ll still need a lot of propeller heads to make sure those ad hoc numbers are right.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s